Truecaller is fighting TRAI's push to prevent spam labels on critical 140 and 1600 numbers. TRAI argues these numbers are verified for banking and government alerts, while Truecaller says they are overrun with scams. Consumers currently rely on Truecaller to flag incoming calls from these "verified" series.
TRAI released its draft Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026, in March. The proposed rules aim to bar call management apps from tagging calls originating from the 140 and 1600 series.
A decision from MeitY on authorizing TRAI to regulate caller ID apps will determine the next phase of this conflict. The final version of the Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026, is still pending public consultation feedback.
🇮🇳 Why This Matters for India
For Bangalore product managers building consumer security features, or Hyderabad financial institutions reliant on call verification, this impacts user trust and operational clarity.
The Take
The big losers are regular Indian consumers, who face increased scam risks as these "verified" lines get exploited. TRAI's DND solution feels tone-deaf to how sophisticated call scams operate today.
Source:  Inc42 ↗