India's copyright applications jumped 80.3% to 44,095 by 2024-25, but the IP system struggles with a new frontier: Generative AI. Generative AI models process vast amounts of copyrighted material for training, blurring the line between content access and fundamental reproduction. This raises critical questions about licensing, remuneration, and enforcement for creators and AI developers alike.
The challenge isn't new; music streaming forced a similar copyright re-evaluation when moving from CDs to digital platforms. However, the 'State of Intellectual Property in India' report, a five-year assessment published by Manohar, flags the current AI issue as significantly larger.
The immediate focus shifts to how the Indian government and judiciary will interpret 'use' in the context of AI training data. Expect legal committees and industry bodies to push for new guidelines or amendments to the Copyright Act within the next 12-18 months.
🇮🇳 Why This Matters for India
For Bangalore-based AI startups and Mumbai's creative studios, this legal ambiguity around training data could significantly increase IP compliance costs and slow innovation.
The Take
India's IP ecosystem registers copyrights efficiently, but its true test lies in establishing a clear, actionable licensing framework for AI. Without this, content creators will struggle for fair remuneration, and AI developers will navigate constant legal uncertainty, hindering innovation for both.
Source:  MediaNama ↗