Delhi Police's RTI response on city-wide surveillance omitted all mention of facial recognition. This lack of transparency directly contradicts public sightings of advanced surveillance vans at recent protests. The omission leaves citizen privacy and potential state overreach completely unaddressed.
IFF filed an RTI after public reports of live CCTV vans at the July 2026 Jantar Mantar protests. The Delhi Police response includes a June 9, 2022 standing order, which the MHA earlier cited regarding facial recognition.
IFF will likely pursue legal avenues, citing the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India judgment, to force transparency. Expect this issue to escalate into specific court filings over the next 3-6 months.
🇮🇳 Why This Matters for India
For Bangalore's tech workforce and Mumbai's startup founders, this lack of transparency sets a concerning precedent for government use of AI in urban surveillance.
The Take
The Delhi Police's response reveals a deliberate strategy to obscure advanced surveillance deployment, not mere bureaucratic oversight. This ambiguity signals a significant risk for citizen privacy, especially as AI-driven predictive policing tools become more common in major Indian cities.
Source:  MediaNama ↗